Sailboat wrote:Question: does anyone know if this amendment was included in the bill in its final form?heather wrote:Mr. Wagoner introduced three amendments to the bill Tuesday that don’t significantly change the bill’s intent, according to Ms. Sears. The first requires that at a court hearing, “the person who designated the dog as a nuisance dog, dangerous dog, or vicious dog has the burden of proving, by clear and convincing evidence, that the dog is a nuisance dog, dangerous dog, or vicious dog.”
That shift in the burden of proof looks like a good thing to me, and I hope it's in the bill when it's signed into law.
I think that's one of the changes that was approved. Also the Govener is supposed to be signing the approved HB14 this tTuesday, 2/21/12 !