Virginia's up to HERE with Anti-breeding bills--PLEASE HELP!

Discuss Breed Specific Legislation and local county laws on pit bull ownership.
User avatar
geisthexe
Newborn Bully
Posts: 123
Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2007 12:58 pm
Location: Moriarty, New Mexico USA
Contact:

Virginia's up to HERE with Anti-breeding bills--PLEASE HELP!

Postby geisthexe » Sun Jan 20, 2008 3:18 pm

PLEASE HELP US WITH EMAILS AND FAXES NOW, PHONE CALLS FIRST THING
MONDAY! YES OUT-OF-STATE CAN HELP! PLEASE DO!

Virginia ended the bill filing period with seven anti-pet breeding
bills -- more than in all previous years together and more than in all
states together in most years. If any of these bills passes, breeding
in our state will be changed forever, and some of them would end hobby
breeding.

I'm not sure we can win without your help.

hWe have 'PAWS for Virginia' -- HB 538. We also have 'AB 1634 for
Virginia' -- HB 1570. We have at least one other bill that would be
even worse. Driven by the first-ever million dollar HSUS state
campaign (press releases about 'puppy mills' and all the rest) and
whipped on by FIVE HSUS lobbyists working the halls in Richmond, our
General Assembly has a whole lot of reasons to get it wrong and not a
whole lot of time to hear from people who know better.

You can't believe how fast things move here. In many other states it
takes a bill at least a few months to go through the process. In
Virginia, bills that start quickly (as our anti-breeding bills have)
can be on the governor's desk in about a month. ONE MONTH, folks. In
fact, the critical action in the first committees will probably take
about ten days, after which the fight will be a lot harder.

We all know that what passes in one state will be tried in others.

The first and best place to stop a bad bill is by getting the
sponsoring lawmaker to WITHDRAW the bill. We ask him to say "Ooops,
changed my mind, this is NOT a good idea ..." That's what we should do
right now. You can make contacts by phone, by fax or by email.

This post just summarizes the bill info (including the two new ones);
the previous posts on this subject had guidelines for making contacts.
Just one reminder: ALWAYS BE POLITE.

==================

VIRGINIA ANTI-BREEDING BILLS

HB691 Animal control officers; inspection of breeding facilities

SPONSOR: Del. Ward L. Armstrong
Phone: Phone: (804) 698-1010
Fax: (804) 786-6310
Email: DelWArmstrong@house.state.va.us

BILL: http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp...?081+ful+HB691

> § 3.1-796.104. Animal control officers; powers and duties. [In part]

> The animal control officer shall make quarterly inspections of any
> premises in his jurisdiction where dealers breed companion animals.
> The animal control officer shall ensure that dealers comply with
> state and federal standards for sanitation, licensure, and adequate
> care.

Virginia law is unclear about whether hobby breeders are 'dealers' but
some localities are assuming so. If this passes, there will be more.

TALKING POINTS:

When a hobby can be inspected at any time then it isn't a hobby
anymore. Many people consider hobby bred dogs and cats to be the best
pets: why should Virginians be deprived of this choice?

This can be interpreted as meaning that federal standards for
commercial (farm) breeding would be applied to home breeding.

The localities aren't asking for this law; the push is from the animal
rights movement and specifically from HSUS. To see all the Virginia
bills HSUS is supporting, go to:

http://www.hsus.org/legislation_laws...egislation-lis
t.html?state=virginia

More inspections means more expense to localities. Who will pay that
expense? Taxpayers, that's who ... more money to get fewer and worse
pets (by ending hobby breeding), boy WHAT a deal!

Animal control can already inspect any place where animals are kept;
all they need is probable cause to believe that a violation is
occurring and a warrant. Why should a family that has a few dogs that
have puppies or cats that have kittens lose this constitutional
protection?

-----------------

HB1486 Dealer permits; local ordinances pertaining to real estate
taxes for euthanizing

SPONSOR: Clifford L. Athey, Jr.
Phone: (804) 698-1018
Fax: (804) 786-6310
Email: DelCAthey@house.state.va.us

http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp...081+ful+HB1486

In Virginia, a 'companion animal' can be anything that anyone thinks
is a pet. 'Dealer' is defined:

> "Dealer" means any person who in the regular course of business for
> compensation or profit buys, sells, transfers, exchanges, or barters
> companion animals.

This is increasingly being interpreted as including hobbyists and a
couple of localities have passed dealer licensing ordinances as
already allowed by the law. This bill would REQUIRE localities to
license all "dealers in companion animals."

TALKING POINTS:

When a hobby can be inspected at any time then it isn't a hobby
anymore. Many people consider hobby bred dogs and cats to be the best
pets: why should Virginians be deprived of this choice?

More inspections means more expense to localities. Who will pay that
expense? Taxpayers, that's who ...

Animal control can already inspect any place where animals are kept;
all they need is probable cause to believe that a violation is
occurring and a warrant. Why should a family that has a few dogs that
have puppies or cats that have kittens lose this constitutional
protection?

User avatar
geisthexe
Newborn Bully
Posts: 123
Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2007 12:58 pm
Location: Moriarty, New Mexico USA
Contact:

Postby geisthexe » Sun Jan 20, 2008 3:20 pm

HB1570 Companion animals; sterilization; penalty

SPONSOR: Robert D. Hull
Phone: (804) 698-1038
Fax: (804) 786-6310
Email: DelRHull@house.state.va.us

http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp...081+ful+HB1570

Think 'California AB 1634 for Virginia' -- but this one gets
commercial sellers too.

Animal pounds, shelters, and rescue groups are already required to
sterilize animals when sold, either prior to sale or by contract with
the buyer for sterilization at a later time. This bill adds 'dealers'
to that list. Since hobbyists are increasingly being considered
dealers (the definition is ambiguous) this would be mandatory
spay/neuter for the state, except for those who want to sign up for
the listed 'exemptions.'

Failure to comply would allow the state veterinarian or a court to
void the sale. Both buyer and seller would be fined $150. There are a
number of specific requirements for the pet sales contract.

The three kinds of 'good' breeders who would be exempt from the
mandatory spay/neuter requirement are defined as follows:

1. "'Breed improver' means a person who: (i) breeds working dogs, show
dogs, and hunting dogs or cats of specific breeds, not as a source of
income, but to perpetuate the breed or eliminate physical shortcomings
and disease, or who could otherwise demonstrate a conscious and
deliberate plan of breed improvement; and (iii) adheres to the
American Kennel Club's 22 responsible breeding steps, United Kennel
Club's breeders code of ethics, American Working Dog Federation's
constitution and bylaws, or a substantially similar code of ethics or
Cat Fanciers' Association breed standards."

2. "'Fancier breeder' means a person who: (i) regularly shows or
competes at competitions sanctioned by the American Kennel Club, the
United Kennel Club, the American Working Dog Federation and their
member clubs, or the Cat Fanciers' Association and their sanctioned
competitions, or similar organizations for rare breed dogs and cats;
and (ii) adheres to the American Kennel Club's 22 responsible breeding
steps, United Kennel Club's breeders code of ethics, American Working
Dog Federation's constitution and bylaws, or a substantially similar
code of ethics or Cat Fanciers' Association breed standards."

3. "'Hobby breeder' means a person who wishes to breed and then will
find homes for one litter, but not for profit."

Fraudulently claiming to be one of the above would get you a fine of
$1000.

TALKING POINTS:

The ones for HB 691 also work here.

If this bill could work as written, it would shift Virginia to
importing most of its dogs and cats. In the real world the shortage
would be modest (prices up say 50%) but a large fraction of our pet
owners and nearly all non-commercial breeders would be in violation of
the law.

User avatar
geisthexe
Newborn Bully
Posts: 123
Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2007 12:58 pm
Location: Moriarty, New Mexico USA
Contact:

Postby geisthexe » Sun Jan 20, 2008 3:21 pm

HB538 Commercial dog breeding operations

SPONSOR: Del. Robert D. Orrock Sr.
Phone: (804)698-1054
Fax: (804) 786-6310
Email: DelBOrrock@house.state.va.us

BILL: http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp...?081+ful+HB538

This bill would define as a 'commercial breeder' "any person who
breeds dogs as companion animals and who maintains 20 or more
unsterilized adult females for the purpose of commercial breeding
during any 12-month period." Commercial breeders would be limited to
50 dogs max, would have to be licensed and inspected, keep specific
records, facilities would have to meet certain fire safety standards
and there would be other restrictions.

There are also requirements that pet shops buy only from USDA licensed
breeders and for commercial breeders (as defined) to sell to pet shops
only if the breeder is USDA licensed.

TALKING POINTS:

What's so good about small (compared to larger) commercial breeding?
The numbers '20' and '50' are completely arbitrary.

Why should Virginia be telling breeders how to run their
hobbies/businesses?

This bill is probably illegal restraint of trade.

Federal law already says who is allowed to buy from or sell to whom.

This bill would eliminate some of the smallest commercial breeders,
why is that good?

Commercial breeders like every other animal owner are subject to
Virginia's animal welfare laws. They can be inspected by state and/or
local authorities at any time, with probable cause to believe that a
violation is occurring and a warrant.

If commercial breeders are eliminated, we'll have a shortage that
hobbyists cannot fill. The result will be importing (including from
foreign countries that may have no animal welfare or health-related
laws at all) and illegal breeding. How would this be better?

-----------------

HB690 Commercial breeding of companion animals

SPONSOR: Del. Ward L. Armstrong
Phone: Phone: (804) 698-1010
Fax: (804) 786-6310
Email: DelWArmstrong@house.state.va.us

BILL: http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp...?081+ful+HB690

This basically would require USDA dealers to also get a license from
their localities. The license would cost $150; anyone having one would
have to allow animal control to inspect if there is a complaint or at
any other time during daytime hours.

TALKING POINTS:

Animal control can already inspect any place where animals are kept;
all they need is probable cause to believe that a violation is
occurring and a warrant.

USDA inspects their licensed dealers.

When more than one authority is allowed to make routine inspections,
you get conflicts: One says the dog houses need to be painted wood,
another says no, they should be plastic.

The only purpose of such a bill is to harass USDA-licensed breeders.
That is not a valid public purpose.

-----------------

HB1232 Overbreeding of cats and dogs; penalty

SPONSOR: Del. Margaret G. Vanderhye
Phone: (804) 698-1034
Fax: (804) 786-6310
Email: DelMVanderhye@house.state.va.us

CO-SPONSOR: Del. Mark D. Sickles
Phone: (804) 698-1043
Fax: (804) 786-6310
Email: DelMSickles@house.state.va.us

CO-SPONSOR: Sen. Patricia Ticer
Phone: (804) 698-7530
Fax:
Email: district30@sov.state.va.us


BILL: http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp...081+ful+HB1232

> Any dealer that breeds more than 20 litters of dogs or cats, or
> sells more than 100 dogs or cats, in any year shall be guilty of a
> Class 3 misdemeanor.

TALKING POINTS:

Most of the HB 538 points also work here.

-----------------

HJ163 Study; companion animals; report (Saxon)

SPONSOR: Del. Christopher B. Saxman
Phone: (804) 698-1020
Fax: (804) 786-6310
Email: DelCSaxman@house.state.va.us

BILL: http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp...?081+ful+HJ163

"Creates a joint subcommittee to study issues related to companion
animals including veterinary medicine, commercial breeding practices,
overpopulation, animal shelters and pounds, dangerous animal laws,
tethering practices, local registration and fee collection, and
procedures for disaster preparedness."

TALKING POINTS:

Animal issues are complex and subtle. The mandate of this study is far
too broad for any meaningful result with four meetings and a budget of
$7200.

Such study groups are invariably dominated by animal rightist and/or
do-gooder viewpoints. There's so much baggage that it's impossible
even to get to basic facts.

tybalt762
Newborn Bully
Posts: 12
Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2008 7:44 am
Location: Reading, PA...Where Everyone Gets Their Shot!

Postby tybalt762 » Fri Jan 25, 2008 2:45 pm

Just for the sake of argument, let's say I really don't see much of a problem here. I mean, some of the bills are a little much, but backyard breeding is insane in Virginia (and it's not much better up here.)

When your local shelter is packed full of perfectly serviceable dogs, most of which are pits or pit mixes, I fail to see how people justify breeding dogs and then selling them intact. You can't tell me you don't think that's pretty irresponsible.

As far as the bills go, I'm always a fan of less legislation...but if you can't trust the people to make a logical, sustainable decision (and in this case, you can't) then the laws are a good thing.

User avatar
SueG
Matured Bully
Posts: 497
Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2005 6:04 pm
Location: Rhode Island

Postby SueG » Fri Jan 25, 2008 4:28 pm

I am all for these bills. I don't see any problem with them at all. Reputable breeders are protected and backyard breeders and puppy mills will have more restrictions placed on them. Sounds perfect to me!!!!!! Go Virginia!

User avatar
mpetva2
Bully Lover 4 Life
Posts: 1284
Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2006 12:45 am
Location: Northern Virginia

Postby mpetva2 » Mon Jan 28, 2008 5:48 pm

I am a Virginian and going by the information that is posted here (without doing further research) I have no problem with any of the changes proposed.
Anything that makes it harder to breed for all BYB, breeders for profit or commercial breeders, forces neuter and spay, I am all for it and say: go for it! And do it fast!

Perhaps some of the changes will help lower the sad number of dogs who die in our state every day.

It looks like the few good and far inbetween good and reputable breeders will still be able to do so with a permit, albeit with more oversight and accountability. And I have no problem with that either.

I just wished that all states would follow suit in limiting breeding and forcing spay and neuter until such a time when animals no longer die by the millions every year in shelters nationwide.
At that time the laws could be changed again.

Karen

User avatar
BullyBud
Bully Ambassador
Posts: 2070
Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2003 10:32 pm
Location: Indy

hobby breeding

Postby BullyBud » Tue Jan 29, 2008 6:51 pm

If any of these bills passes, breeding
in our state will be changed forever, and some of them would end hobby
breeding.
:thumbsup:

With the barrels of dead dogs coming out the back of shelters, I think ending hobby breeding is a good thing! :thumbsup:

User avatar
AddyBaby
Adolescent Bully
Posts: 323
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 3:24 pm
Location: Northern VA USA

Postby AddyBaby » Mon Feb 04, 2008 9:29 am

Deb,

None of the links are working. Can you repost them? Did the talking points come from Bob Kane of VHDOA?

Jenny

User avatar
MikeInTacoma
Moderator
Posts: 3421
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2007 4:27 am
Location: Tacoma, WA, USA
Contact:

Postby MikeInTacoma » Mon Feb 04, 2008 4:55 pm

As far as I could see, these laws were fine -- especially with the exemptions for breed improvers, breed fanciers, and hobby breeders. If anything, I'd worry that the $1000 fine for misrepresentation is not enough of a deterrent -- make it a $10,000 fine.


Return to “Laws”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest